Colorado’s 7-3 home record gives them the edge in a 28-point meeting
What is at stake, with the data behind it
Colorado Rapids and Real Salt Lake are level on 28 points, but Colorado’s strong home record contrasts sharply with Real Salt Lake’s difficult away campaign. Formation choices, recent form and several defensive absences could shape a close Western Conference contest.
A 28-point meeting with contrasting home and away records
Colorado Rapids and Real Salt Lake meet at Dick's Sporting Goods Park on Sunday, August 30, with both clubs sitting on 28 points in the Western Conference. Colorado are seventh after 21 games, while Real Salt Lake are eighth after 20. The gap to Vancouver Whitecaps at the top is 12 points for both sides, making this an important opportunity to improve their position rather than lose further ground.
The hosts have a clear statistical advantage on their own ground. Colorado have won seven of 10 home matches, scoring 20 goals and conceding nine, while also recording five clean sheets. Real Salt Lake’s away record is far less convincing: one win, three draws and six losses, with 12 goals scored, 19 conceded and no clean sheets. Those numbers should encourage Colorado to play on the front foot, while Real Salt Lake may prioritise structure and limiting early damage.
Two different teams?
Home and away form for Colorado Rapids
- At Home
- Away
Season data from the article’s source snapshot; this chart is not a statistic for this match alone.
Formation contrast could shape the contest
Colorado’s 4-2-3-1 has been their preferred shape, used in 11 matches, with the 4-3-3 another option used six times. That suggests a setup built around midfield balance and attacking width, particularly at home where their scoring average reaches 2.00 goals per game. Real Salt Lake have most often used a back-three system, with the 3-4-2-1 deployed in eight matches and the 3-4-3 in seven.
The tactical question will be whether Colorado can use their forward numbers and home momentum to stretch Real Salt Lake’s three-man defence. Real Salt Lake’s shape can provide width through the midfield and support for the front line, but Colorado’s two-goal home average gives the visitors a strong reason to protect the spaces around their defensive unit. The away side’s 1.90 goals conceded per game also highlights the pressure on that organisation.
How they line up
Most-used formations this season
Season data from the article’s source snapshot; this chart is not a statistic for this match alone.
Momentum and team news
Colorado’s most recent five results read loss, win, win, loss and win, while Real Salt Lake’s are loss, win, win, win and draw. Both have therefore shown winning form, although each also arrives after a defeat. Colorado’s absences include M. Diop, T. Ku-DiPietro, M. Navarro, Z. Steffen, K. Stewart-Baynes and J. Travis. Z. Steffen’s shoulder injury and the loss of K. Stewart-Baynes could affect the hosts’ options, while the other unavailable players further reduce flexibility.
Real Salt Lake will be without Z. Booth, G. Dillon, E. Eneli, J. Glad and A. Piol, with S. Spierings questionable. J. Glad’s absence is particularly relevant to a side reliant on a back-three structure, while the uncertainty over Spierings adds another selection issue. With the table finely balanced, both teams have reason to value control, but Colorado’s home record makes them the more convincing choice.
Prediction
Colorado Rapids 2-1 Real Salt Lake. Colorado’s stronger home record and Real Salt Lake’s defensive results away from home point to a narrow advantage for the hosts.
Explore match and season data

Colorado Rapids

Real Salt Lake
Standings source snapshot
These are the saved source standings. They may predate this match; they are not a live or recalculated post-match table.
| Logo | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | WLWDD | 20 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 45 | 18 | 40 | |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | LWWWW | 21 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 26 | 38 | |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | DLLDW | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 36 | 22 | 35 | |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | LLLLD | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 39 | 33 | 33 | |
| 5 | FC Dallas | LWWDL | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 38 | 34 | 33 | |
| 6 | St. Louis City | WDWDW | 21 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 27 | 33 | |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | LWWWL | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 30 | 28 | 28 | |
| 8 | Real Salt Lake | LLDDL | 20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 34 | 32 | 28 | |
| 9 | Portland Timbers | DWLWW | 21 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 38 | 37 | 28 | |
| 10 | Minnesota United FC | WLDDD | 21 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 27 | 29 | 28 | |
| 11 | San Diego | WLWDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 37 | 32 | 27 | |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | DWLDD | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 27 | 32 | 26 | |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | DLLLL | 20 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 27 | 25 | |
| 14 | Austin | DWLLL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 26 | 40 | 21 | |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | LDLLL | 21 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 51 | 15 | |
| 1 | Nashville SC | WWWDL | 21 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 17 | 49 | |
| 2 | Inter Miami | LDLDW | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 49 | 40 | 39 | |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | DWWWL | 20 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 26 | 36 | |
| 4 | New England Revolution | DWLLD | 21 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 33 | 26 | 34 | |
| 5 | Charlotte | WDWLW | 21 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 38 | 32 | 32 | |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | DWDWL | 21 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 49 | 47 | 31 | |
| 7 | New York City FC | DLLDW | 21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 35 | 30 | 27 | |
| 8 | New York Red Bulls | DLLWL | 21 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 31 | 43 | 26 | |
| 9 | Orlando City SC | WLDLW | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 34 | 51 | 24 | |
| 10 | Toronto FC | WDWDL | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 31 | 37 | 24 | |
| 11 | DC United | LLDDW | 21 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 28 | 36 | 24 | |
| 12 | Atlanta United FC | WWWLL | 21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 25 | 36 | 21 | |
| 13 | Philadelphia Union | DDWWW | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 31 | 38 | 21 | |
| 14 | CF Montreal | DWDDL | 21 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 29 | 39 | 21 | |
| 15 | Columbus Crew | LLLDW | 21 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 30 | 36 | 20 |